• Users Online: 164
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
CASE REPORT
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 14  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 69-75

A rare case of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in an unusual location


Department of Anatomic Pathology, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Kwara, Nigeria

Date of Submission31-Mar-2022
Date of Acceptance30-Jun-2022
Date of Web Publication26-Dec-2022

Correspondence Address:
Olaleke Oluwasegun Folaranmi
Department of Anatomic Pathology, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Kwara
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/njgh.njgh_6_22

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. They originate or differentiate toward the interstitial cells of Cajal, an integral part of the GI autonomic nervous system of the GI tract. GISTs are mostly seen arising from the muscularis mucosa or propria layer of the stomach or small intestine with just one case of gastric GIST reported arising from the serosal layer. We report the case of a 46-year-old woman who presented with progressive abdominal mass and abdominal pain. Computed tomography scan and intraoperative findings revealed a huge, well-circumscribed cystic mass arising from the anti-mesenteric border of the ileum. An impression of mesenteric desmoid tumor was made but diagnosed to be GIST on histological examination with immunohistochemistry. This report shows the importance of including GIST in the differentials when investigating serosal based tumors of the GI tract even when the radioimaging findings are inconsistent.

Keywords: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor, interstitial cells of cajal, serosa, small intestine


How to cite this article:
Folaranmi OO, Odetunde OA. A rare case of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in an unusual location. Niger J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022;14:69-75

How to cite this URL:
Folaranmi OO, Odetunde OA. A rare case of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in an unusual location. Niger J Gastroenterol Hepatol [serial online] 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 8];14:69-75. Available from: https://www.njghonweb.org/text.asp?2022/14/2/69/365314




  Introduction Top


Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common primary mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.[1],[2] GIST can arise in any portion of the GI tract; however, the stomach (40%–60%) is the most common site followed by the small intestine (30%–40%).[3]

GISTs originate or differentiate toward cells showing morphological and immunophenotypic similarities with the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC). Several subpopulations of ICC have been described and these include submucosal, septal, deep muscle plexus, intramuscular, myenteric, and subserosal ICC.[4] GISTs usually arise from the muscular layers of the GI tracts (muscularis mucosa or propria). GIST arising from the serosa is rare, with handful of cases reported in the last few years.[5],[6],[7],[8]


  Case history Top


We report the case of a 46-year-old woman who presented to the gynecology clinic on account of progressive abdominal mass of 3 years and abdominal pain of 6-month duration. Physical examination revealed a tender left abdomino-pelvic mass measuring approximately 20 cm × 18 cm × 18 cm, extending from the left pelvic area to the supra-umbilical region. Clinical impression was suspected ovarian mass. The ultrasonography showed a thick-walled heterogeneous mass arising from the left pelvic region and extending to the supra-umbilical region. The bowels were reported to have normal wall thickness and intraluminal diameter with normal peristalsis observed. The computed tomography (CT) scan however showed a huge, well-circumscribed mass appearing to arise from the mesentery in the left lower abdominal area with solid and cystic components and no evidence of any connection with the left adnexal structures. The bowels showed normal caliber and wall thickness. No nodal involvement or features suggestive of metastatic deposits were seen. An impression of mesenteric desmoid tumor was made.

The patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy and intraoperative findings included a huge cystic mass arising from the anti-mesenteric border of the small intestine (ileum) approximately 228 cm from the duodenojejunal junction, displacing the bowel to the right upper quadrant. The mass was not invading nearby organs or structures. The left adnexal structures were unremarkable. The mass contained approximately 5 L of hemorrhagic effluent seen in the theatre. The ileum was resected along with the mesenteric mass and sent for histological diagnosis.

Gross examination showed a segment of small intestine measuring 10 cm in length with an attached huge fleshy to tan cystic mass measuring 14 cm × 16 cm × 16 cm at the anti-mesenteric area. The mass was cut open to reveal fleshy to cystic surface with a core of degenerated hemorrhagic tissue with a diameter of 12 cm [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Gross photograph of the cut section of the serosal mass consisting of partly solid gray to tan areas with hemorrhagic and necrotic core

Click here to view


The intestinal segment showed patent lumen with preserved mucosal folds with no mass lesion seen.

The histological sections showed small intestinal tissue with the tumor located at the serosal layer and separate from the intact muscular layer [Figure 2]. The tumor cells are disposed in short whorls, fascicles, nodules, and in diffuse sheets. They show pleomorphic, hyperchromatic plump to spindle nuclei with prominent nucleoli and areas of brisk mitotic activity (5 per 10 high-power fields) with atypical mitoses [Figure 3]. There are also extensive areas of necrosis. The stroma is scant and composed of loose fibromyxoid areas with interspersed thin-walled vascular channels. The resected margins were free of the tumor.
Figure 2: Histological sections at low power showing the proliferating mesenchymal cells in the serosal layer seen separate from the preserved muscularis propria (black arrow). H/E ×40

Click here to view
Figure 3: Histological sections at medium power showing short whorls of spindle-shaped cells with fairly pleomorphic, hyperchromatic nuclei, and scant faintly eosinophilic to clear cytoplasm. Some thin-walled vascular channels are seen. An atypical mitotic figure is seen at the top left corner (blue arrow). H/E ×100

Click here to view


Based on the morphological features, a preliminary diagnosis of GIST was made. However, other differentials considered include neural sheath tumor, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor and de-differentiated liposarcoma.

Immunohistochemical (IHC) studies done showed CD117++, DOG1++, Ki67 20%–25%, CD34–, SMA–, desmin–, ALK–, panCK– and S100–[Figure 4][Figure 5][Figure 6].
Figure 4: Microscopic section showing the spindle tumor cells with membrane and cytoplasmic positivity with c-KIT/CD117. IHC ×400

Click here to view
Figure 5: Microscopic section showing the spindle tumor cells with membrane and cytoplasmic positivity with DOG1. IHC ×100

Click here to view
Figure 6: Microscopic section showing approximately 25% of tumor cells showing nuclear expression of Ki67. IHC ×400

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


GIST is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the GI tract and accounts for 1%–3% of GI neoplasms.[1],[2],[9] They are believed to arise or differentiate toward ICC, an important part of the GI autonomic nervous system functioning as a pacemaker system within the walls of the GI tract.[1] GISTs usually originate in the stomach or small intestine but can occur anywhere along the GI tract such as the colon, rectum, appendix, esophagus. Involvement of sites outside the GI tract such as the omentum and retroperitoneum are very rare.[7],[10],[11] GISTs in the omentum, mesenteries, and retroperitoneum are usually metastasis from a GI origin or possibly detached from their GI origin. Only very few have been reported as primaries from these sites.[5],[6],[8],[12]

Expression of the c-KIT proto-oncogene is essential for the development of GIST.[11] Hence, they are tumors with mutations in the KIT gene or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) gene,[13] and thus immunohistochemical recognition of KIT protein expression (CD117) is a reliable diagnostic marker of the disease. The c-KIT proto-oncogene located on chromosome 4q 11–12 encodes the transmembrane tyrosine kinase KIT.[14] Gain-of-function mutation of c-KIT was first discovered and reported in human GISTs in 1998.[15]

These activating mutations lead to hyperplasia of the ICCs and GISTs. Mutation of KIT with constitutive activation of tyrosine kinase is found in the majority (75%) of GISTs, whereas PDGFRA gene mutation occurs in approximately 10% of cases.[16] Approximately 15% of GISTs do not have detectable KIT or PDGFRA gene mutation, but have germ-line mutation in the SDH gene and are termed “wild-type” GISTs. Other genetic mutations detected in wild-type GISTs include BRAF, HRAS, NRAS, and PIK3CA. Certain syndromes have been reported to be associated with GIST such as neurofibromatosis type 1, Carney-Stratakis syndrome, and Carney triad.[16]

GISTs of the small intestine are often asymptomatic because most of them grow in an exophytic pattern till they are large in size.[5],[7] The median size of GISTs in the small intestine has been reported to be as large as 7 cm at the time of diagnosis,[17] whereas those greater than 10 cm in diameter have been termed as giant GISTs.[18] Patients present with highly variable, non-specific clinical symptoms such as GI bleeding, vague abdominal mass, palpable mass and even fever.[17] The standard investigation of choice for evaluation of tumor size, location, and metastases is contrast-enhanced CT imaging.[7]

In this index case, the tumor was much larger than those earlier reported; it measured approximately 16 cm in its widest diameter and yet no GI symptoms were reported by the patient. This is understandable considering the unusual location as the mass did not compromise the luminal integrity of the small intestine. The radioimaging investigations did not reveal the intestinal origin of this mass and this was only realized intraoperatively.

Complete surgical resection is the only potential curative treatment for GISTs.[7],[19],[20] For small intestinal GISTs, resection of segments of the intestine with the tumor is the standard surgical management. However, the tumor should be handled with great care because rupture of the pseudocapsule may lead to tumor dissemination and poor prognosis.[19],[21]

GISTs are well-defined, unencapsulated tumors that are firm in consistency and gray-white in color. Smaller masses have a homogeneous cut surface, whereas large lesions may show areas of necrosis and hemorrhage with cystic degeneration. Microscopically, GISTs show three histological patterns: the spindle cell type which is the most common type (70%), epithelioid type (20%–25%), and mixed spindle cell and epithelioid type. They usually vary from hypocellular to highly cellular tumor with higher mitotic activity.[22] The vast majority of GISTs (95%) are strongly and diffusely positive for c-KIT (CD117), hence making it a specific and sensitive marker in differentiating GIST from other histologically similar mesenchymal tumors in the GI tract.[2],[23] DOG1 has similar sensitivity and specificity as CD117 and in fact is expressed in most tumors that do not express CD117, making it a valuable second-line diagnostic marker for GIST. A minor subset of GISTs especially of small intestinal origin reacts positively with h-caldesmon and Smooth Muscle Actin (SMA). Generally, these tumors do not show reactivity with S100, desmin, and cytokeratins, but rare exceptions have been reported showing focal reactivity.[2] Less than 5% of GISTs show negative reactivity to CD117. These tumors have mutations that activate PDGFRA and may also be inhibited by imatinib.[23] Imatinib mesylate, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets KIT, has been shown to improve prognosis after radical resection of high-risk GISTs.[7],[24] Approximately 70% of GISTs express CD34 on IHC.[6]

The main differential diagnosis of GIST includes smooth muscle tumors, schwannoma (intensely positive for S100-protein, but negative for CD117), desmoid fibromatosis (CD117-negative), inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (both negative for CD117 and CD34), inflammatory fibroid polyp, solitary fibrous tumor (CD117-negative), synovial sarcoma, and melanoma (HMB45 and Melan A-positive).[25] The accurate diagnosis of GIST is critical as the treatment differs from other differentials. This is even more important in low-resource practice settings, where access to ancillary testing is very difficult.

Metastases have been reported in approximately 50% of cases in GISTs, with the liver (65%) being the most frequent organ, followed by the peritoneum (21%). Other sites of metastasis include the retro-peritoneum and the brain. Metastases to lymph nodes, lungs, and bones are rare.[6],[21]

The investigation of choice for staging and follow-up of GIST is contrast-enhanced abdominal and pelvic CT scan, whereas early detection of tumor response to molecular-targeted therapy (such as imatinib) or neoadjuvant therapy is evaluated with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake using an FDG-positron emission tomography (PET) scan.[6],[7]


  Conclusion Top


GIST is the most common primary mesenchymal neoplasm of the GI tract. It is mostly found in the stomach, whereas a third of cases are seen in the small intestine. However, occurrence in the large intestine and extra intestinal sites is extremely rare. It is important to keep GIST in the differentials when investigating serosal-based tumors of the GI tract even when the radioimaging findings are not consistent. This tumor has broadly variable morphological characteristics, and so it is crucial that it is distinguished from other much uncommon mesenchymal neoplasms through ancillary tests, particularly immunohistochemistry to establish the definitive diagnosis and enable the appropriate management.

Acknowledgement

We would like to acknowledge Prof. Pepe Jiménez Heffernan of Universidad Autónoma de Madrid for providing technical support in the course of the workup for this case.

Financial support and sponsorship

Not applicable.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Nilsson B, Bümming P, Meis-Kindblom JM, Odén A, Dortok A, Gustavsson B, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: The incidence, prevalence, clinical course, and prognostication in the preimatinib mesylate era: A population-based study in western Sweden. Cancer 2005;103:821-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Abdulkareem FB, Rotimi O, Elesha SO, Banjo AA Immunophe­notyping of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumours in Lagos, Nigeria. West Afr J Med 2009;28:358-62.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Joensuu H Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). 31st ESMO Congr Educ Program, 29 Sept–3 October, 2006 Istanbul, Turkey. 2006;17:x280-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Blair PJ, Rhee PL, Sanders KM, Ward SM The significance of interstitial cells in neurogastroenterology. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014;20:294-317.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Baheti AD, Shinagare AB, O’Neill AC, Krajewski KM, Hornick JL, George S, et al. MDCT and clinicopathological features of small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumours in 102 patients: A single institute experience. Br J Radiol 2015;88:20150085.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Ashoor AA, Barefah G Case report: Unusual presentation of a large GIST in an extraintestinal site: A challenging diagnosis dilemma. BMJ Case Rep 2020;13:229839.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Ayandipo OO, Ogun GO, Ajagbe OA, Adegoke OO, Adepoju OJ, Rahman A, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor experience in a surgical oncological unit in sub-Saharan Africa: A retrospective analysis. J Clin Sci 2021;18:98.  Back to cited text no. 7
  [Full text]  
8.
Suryawanshi KH, Patil TB, Damle RP, Dravid NV, Surana A Gastrointestinal stromal tumour of small intestine presenting as a mesenteric mass. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:FD14-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Kwaghe BV, Richard SK, Abobarin F, Akpa P, Innocent E, Ochigbo A, et al. The prevalence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour as seen in the Jos University Teaching Hospital (JUTH), Jos, North Central Nigeria. Jos J Med 2021;13:55-60.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Ogun GO, Adegoke OO, Rahman A, Egbo OH Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): A review of cases from Nigeria. J Gastrointest Cancer 2020;51:729-37.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Kindblom LG, Remotti HE, Aldenborg F, Meis-Kindblom JM Gastrointestinal pacemaker cell tumor (GIPACT): Gastrointestinal stromal tumors show phenotypic characteristics of the interstitial cells of Cajal. Am J Pathol 1998;152:1259-69.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Ahmadu BU, Nnanubumom AA, Ibrahim RA Rare occurrence of mix stromal tumours: A case report of gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal stromal tumour on the jejunum and omentum of a nine year old girl from Adamawa state, Nigeria. Ethiop J Health Sci 2013;23:174-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Miettinen M, Lasota J Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Review on morphology, molecular pathology, prognosis, and differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006;130:1466-78.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Hirota S, Isozaki K Pathology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Pathol Int 2006;56:1-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Hirota S, Isozaki K, Moriyama Y, Hashimoto K, Nishida T, Ishiguro S, et al. Gain-of-function mutations of c-KIT in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science 1998;279:577-80.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Ahmed M Recent advances in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. World J Clin Cases 2020;8:3142-55.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Miettinen M, Makhlouf H, Sobin LH, Lasota J Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the jejunum and ileum: A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 906 cases before imatinib with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:477-89.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Koyuncuer A, Gönlüşen L, Kutsal AV A rare case of giant gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach involving the serosal surface. Int J Surg Case Rep 2015;12:90-4.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Lai EC, Lau SH, Lau WY Current management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A comprehensive review. Int J Surg 2012;10:334-40.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Oludara M, Onyekwere C, Ibrahim N, Popoola A, Omodele F Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: A review of cases seen at a university hospital over an eight year period. Niger J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;5:35-40.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Afuwape OO, Irabor DO, Ladipo JK Gastrointestinal stromal tumour in Ibadan, Nigeria: A case report and review of current treatment. Afr Health Sci 2011;11:134-8.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Miettinen M, Lasota J Histopathology of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Surg Oncol 2011;104:865-73.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Hornick JL, Fletcher CD The role of KIT in the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Hum Pathol 2007;38: 679-87.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, Hartmann JT, Pink D, Schütte J, et al. One vs three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A randomized trial. JAMA 2012;307:1265-72.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Tarafder AJ, Mamun–Al-Mahtab, Das SR, Shaha M, Haque I, Karim R, et al. A case report: Small intestinal. J Hepat Res 2015;2:1-3.  Back to cited text no. 25
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Case history
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed900    
    Printed8    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded31    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal